Take a look at the feature requests and work.Ģ years of development? lol no. How many hours (years?) of development are required to implement "RANGES" in automations? How is usable if you can't automate it? It's here but it's useless, under construction. How is usable if i can't even set the start phase? Do you think that the parameter modulation LFO is OK? How is usable for example the LFO in the parameter modulation? but only if there are unique and innovative features. I can however accept an uncomfortable and confusing environments.
#Fabfilter timeless link to preset automation manual
requires heavy use of the left side of our brains (the opposite of Studio One :) (Studio One manual says: "Give your left brain a break and stay in the creative zone!") and the features implemented are still "under construction", uncomfortable, confusing. Years, you are right, a feature that require some hours to be implemented (at least in a BASIC way) will not be released until years, that's reality, we want it in the next update. How many years will it take to finally have a fast and reliable way of automation editing? :( Right, it's a BASIC feature, look at Studio one. Im still whining about those automation in midi clips :o Someone knows why almost every other DAW have such function implemented?
0 kommentar(er)
